Current:Home > InvestKentucky Supreme Court strikes down new law giving participants right to change venue-LoTradeCoin
Kentucky Supreme Court strikes down new law giving participants right to change venue
View Date:2024-12-23 19:41:24
FRANKFORT, Ky. (AP) — Kentucky’s Supreme Court on Thursday struck down a new state law that allowed participants in constitutional challenges to get the cases switched to randomly selected counties. The court said the legislature’s action on the assignment of court cases encroached on judicial authority.
The law, enacted this year over the governor’s veto, allowed any participants to request changes of venue for civil cases challenging the constitutionality of laws, orders or regulations. It required the clerk of the state Supreme Court to choose another court through a random selection.
Such constitutional cases typically are heard in Franklin County Circuit Court in the capital city of Frankfort. For years, Republican officials have complained about a number of rulings from Franklin circuit judges in high-stakes cases dealing with constitutional issues.
The high court’s ruling was a victory for Democratic Gov. Andy Beshear, who in his veto message denounced the measure as an “unconstitutional power grab” by the state’s GOP-dominated legislature. Lawmakers overrode the governor’s veto, sparking the legal fight that reached the state’s highest court.
Republican Attorney General Daniel Cameron’s office defended the venue law, which passed as Senate Bill 126. Cameron is challenging Beshear in the Nov. 7 gubernatorial election — one of the nation’s highest-profile campaigns this year.
Writing for the court’s majority, Chief Justice Laurance B. VanMeter said the new law amounted to a violation of constitutional separation of powers.
The measure granted “unchecked power to a litigant to remove a judge from a case under the guise of a “transfer,” circumventing the established recusal process, the chief justice wrote.
“It operates to vest a certain class of litigants with the unfettered right to forum shop, without having to show any bias on the part of the presiding judge, or just cause for removal,” VanMeter said.
The measure also resulted in “divesting the circuit court of its inherent jurisdiction and authority to decide when and if a case should be transferred to another venue,” he said.
Responding to the ruling, Cameron’s office insisted the legislature had acted within its authority.
“The legislature has always had broad authority to decide where lawsuits should be heard,” the attorney general’s office said in a statement. “Today’s opinion backtracks on that established principle and diminishes the power of the people’s branch of government.”
In a dissenting opinion, Justice Robert Conley said the legislature has the constitutional authority to pass legislation “fixing venue and providing for changes of venue.”
“SB126 is new and it is different from what the judiciary is used to,” he wrote. “I deem it unwise, imprudent, inefficient and inexpedient. But I cannot say it is unconstitutional.”
In his March veto message, Beshear said the measure was aimed at one court. The intent, he said, was to “control Kentucky courts and block any civil action alleging a law is unconstitutional from being heard in one circuit court: the Franklin Circuit Court.”
veryGood! (4268)
Related
- Ex-Phoenix Suns employee files racial discrimination, retaliation lawsuit against the team
- Travis Kelce and Patrick Mahomes Teaming Up for Delicious New Business
- 50 killed in anti-sorcery rituals after being forced to drink mysterious liquid, Angola officials say
- Reneé Rapp Details Most Rewarding Experience of Her Coming Out Journey
- Jenn Tran's Ex Devin Strader Throws Shade At Her DWTS Partner Sasha Farber Amid Romance Rumors
- Semi-truck manufacturer recalls 116,000 Kenworth and Peterbilt semis over safety concerns
- Get $95 Good American Pants for $17, Plus More Major Deals To Keep Up With Khloé Kardashian's Style
- Bears land Pro Bowl wide receiver Keenan Allen in shocking trade with Chargers
- Olivia Munn Says She “Barely Knew” John Mulaney When She Got Pregnant With Their Son
- How an indie developers tearful video about her game tanking led to unexpected success
Ranking
- Sister Wives' Janelle Brown Details to Meri Why She Can't Trust Ex Kody and His Sole Wife Robyn
- Driver charged in deadly Arizona crash after report cast doubt on his claim that steering locked up
- Savannah Chrisley Shares Why Parents Todd and Julie Chrisley Still Haven't Spoken Since Entering Prison
- Man wins $1 million on Mega Millions and proposes to longtime girlfriend
- Arbitrator upholds 5-year bans of Bad Bunny baseball agency leaders, cuts agent penalty to 3 years
- Newly discovered giant turtle fossil named after Stephen King character
- AP Decision Notes: What to expect in Ohio’s presidential and state primaries
- Jax Taylor Addresses Cheating Rumors and Reveals the Real Reason for Brittany Cartwright Breakup
Recommendation
-
Judge set to rule on whether to scrap Trump’s conviction in hush money case
-
Score a Samsung Phone for $120, a $250 Coach Bag for $75, 25% Off Kylie Cosmetics & More Major Deals
-
Gypsy Rose Blanchard Shares Why She Deleted Her Social Media Accounts
-
As Conflict Rages On, Israel and Gaza’s Environmental Fates May Be Intertwined
-
Just Eat Takeaway sells Grubhub for $650 million, just 3 years after buying the app for $7.3 billion
-
Chiefs signing Hollywood Brown in move to get Patrick Mahomes some wide receiver help
-
Denying same-sex marriage is unconstitutional, a Japanese high court says
-
Alec Baldwin Files Motion to Dismiss Involuntary Manslaughter Charges in Rust Shooting Case