Current:Home > FinanceSupreme Court seems ready to deny trademark for 'Trump Too Small' T-shirts-LoTradeCoin
Supreme Court seems ready to deny trademark for 'Trump Too Small' T-shirts
View Date:2024-12-23 17:04:12
Donald Trump finally got to the Supreme Court on Wednesday. Indirectly. He was not a plaintiff, a defendant or a target. But his name and image were the issue.
The case dates back to a presidential primary debate to 2016 and Sen. Marco Rubio's mocking of candidate Trump as having "small hands."
"He hit my hands," Trump protested. "Look at these hands, are these small hands?" And, "If they're small, something else must be small. I guarantee you there's no problem. I guarantee," he said, with a knowing smirk.
Two years later, part-time Democratic activist Steve Elster applied to trademarkthe phrase "TRUMP TOO SMALL" for use on T-shirts. The Patent and Trademark office rejected the proposed mark because federal law bars trademark registration of a living person's name without his consent. The trademark office said that nothing prevents Elster or anyone else from using the phrase, but without a trademark.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit disagreed, ruling that the denial of the trademark violated Elster's free speech rights.
That argument, however, had few, if any takers at the Supreme Court Wednesday.
"The question is, is this an infringement on speech? And the answer is no," said Justice Sonia Sotomayor. "He can sell as many shirts with this [Trump Too Small] saying as he wants."
Justice Clarence Thomas made a similar point in questioning Elster's lawyer, Jonathan Taylor, who conceded that without a trademark his client can still make and market as many shirts or mugs as he wants with the emblem "Trump Too Small."
So, asked Thomas, "What speech is precisely being burdened?"
Taylor replied that Elster is being denied "important rights and benefits" that are "generally available to all trademark holders who pay the registration fee, and he is being denied that "solely because his mark expresses a message about a public figure."
In other words, the denial of the trademark means that Elster can't charge others a fee for using the phrase "Trump too small."
That prompted Justice Elena Kagan to observe that the court has repeatedly said that "as long as its not viewpoint based, government... can give benefits to some and not ... to others."
Justice Neil Gorsuch chimed in to say that "there have always been content restrictions of some kind" on trademarks. Justice Brett Kavanaugh agreed, noting that "Congress thinks it's appropriate to put a restriction on people profiting off commercially appropriating someone else's name."
And Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson added that a "trademark is not about the First Amendment." It's "about source identifying and preventing consumer confusion."
And finally, there was this from Chief Justice John Roberts: "What do you do about the government's argument that you're the one undermining First Amendment values because the whole point of the trademark, of course, is preventing other people from doing the same thing. If you win a trademark for the slogan ;Trump Too Small,' other people can't use it, right?"
If that really is a problem, replied lawyer Taylor, then Congress can fix it. But he didn't say how.
Bottom line at the end of Wednesday's argument? Yes, Virginia, there ARE some things that Supreme Court justices apparently do agree on.
veryGood! (58)
Related
- Britney Spears reunites with son Jayden, 18, after kids moved in with dad Kevin Federline
- 10 to watch: Lee Kiefer made US fencing history. Now she chases repeat Olympic gold
- With ‘flat’ wedding rates, Vegas officials and chapels want more couples to say ‘I do’
- 2nd suspect arrested in triple homicide case at a Phoenix-area apartment, police say
- Father, 5 children hurt in propane tank explosion while getting toys: 'Devastating accident'
- Meet the girls who started an Eras Tour craze with some balloons and got a Swift shoutout
- Boston Red Sox sign manager Alex Cora to three-year extension
- Phoenix man sentenced to life in prison without parole after killing his parents and younger brother
- NYC bans unusual practice of forcing tenants to pay real estate brokers hired by landlords
- NovaBit Trading Center: Approved for listing: A decade in the making, reflecting on the journey of Ethereum ETF #2
Ranking
- Why Officials Believe a Missing Kayaker Faked His Own Death and Ran Off to Europe
- A Guide to Clint Eastwood’s Sprawling Family
- Kehlani announces Crash concert tour: How to get tickets
- Terminal at New York’s JFK Airport briefly evacuated because of escalator fire
- Early Week 11 fantasy football rankings: 30 risers and fallers
- 2024 Olympics: Meet the International Athletes Hoping to Strike Gold in Paris
- Trump rally gunman fired 8 shots in under 6 seconds before he was killed, analysis shows
- Comic Con 2024: What to expect as the convention returns to San Diego
Recommendation
-
Love Actually Secrets That Will Be Perfect to You
-
Hugh Jackman claws his way back to superhero glory in 'Deadpool & Wolverine': Review
-
How USA Basketball saved coach Jim Boylen after he lost brother, marriage, NBA job
-
Trump's DJT stock falls as Kamala Harris hits campaign trail
-
Man killed in Tuskegee University shooting in Alabama is identified. 16 others were hurt
-
Phoenix man sentenced to life in prison without parole after killing his parents and younger brother
-
Oilers name Stan Bowman GM. He was recently reinstated after Blackhawks scandal.
-
Billy Ray Cyrus Tells Ex Firerose “See You in Court” After Release of Shocking Argument