Current:Home > BackSupreme Court unanimously sides with Twitter in ISIS attack case-LoTradeCoin
Supreme Court unanimously sides with Twitter in ISIS attack case
View Date:2024-12-23 15:24:56
The U.S. Supreme Court handed social media companies a major victory Thursday in the first test case involving the immunity from lawsuits granted to internet platforms for the content they publish online.
In two separate cases, one against Twitter, the other against Google, the families of people killed in terrorist bombing attacks in Istanbul and Paris sued Twitter, Facebook, Google and YouTube, claiming that the companies had violated the federal Anti-Terrorism Act, which specifically allows civil damage claims for aiding and abetting terrorism.
The families alleged that the companies did more than passively provide platforms for communication. Rather, they contended that by recommending ISIS videos to those who might be interested, the internet platforms were seeking to get more viewers and increase their ad revenue, even though they knew that ISIS was using their services as a recruitment tool.
But on Thursday, the Supreme Court unanimously rejected those claims. Writing for the Court, Justice Clarence Thomas said that the social media companies' so-called recommendations were nothing more than "agnostic" algorithms that navigated an "immense ocean of content" in order to "match material to users who might be interested."
"The mere creation of those algorithms," he said, does not constitute culpability, any more than it would for a telephone company whose services are used to broker drug deals on a cell phone.
At bottom, he said, the claims in these cases rest "less on affirmative misconduct and more on an alleged failure to stop ISIS from using these platforms."
In order to have a claim, he said, the families would have to show that Twitter, Google, or some other social media platform "pervasively" and with knowledge, assisted ISIS in "every single attack."
Columbia University law professor Timothy Wu, who specializes in this area of the law, said Thursday's decision was "less than hopeful" for those who wanted the court to curb the scope of the law known as "Section 23o," shorthand for the provision enacted in 1996 to shield internet platforms from being sued for other people's content. Wu said even the Biden administration had looked to the court to begin "the task of 230 reform."
Instead, the justices sided with the social media companies. And while Wu said that puts new pressure on Congress to "do something," he is doubtful that in the current political atmosphere anything will actually happen.
The decision--and its unanimity-- were a huge win for social media companies and their supporters. Lawyer Andrew Pincus, who filed a brief on behalf of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, said he saw the decision as a victory for free speech, and a vindication of Section 230's protections from lawsuits for internet platforms. What's more, he said, a contrary ruling would have subjected these platforms to "an unbelievable avalanche" of litigation.
Congress knew what it was doing when it enacted section 230, he said. "What it wanted was to facilitate broad online debate and to make those platforms accessible to everyone."
Section 230, however, also has a provision encouraging internet companies to police their platforms, so as to remove harassing, defamatory, and false content. And while some companies point to their robust efforts to take down such content, Twitter, the company that won Thursday's case, is now owned by Elon Musk who, since acquiring the company, has fired many of the people who were charged with eliminating disinformation and other harmful content on the site.
The immunity from lawsuits granted to social media companies was enacted by Congress nearly three decades ago, when the internet was in its infancy. Today both the right and the left routinely attack that preferential status, noting that other content publishers are not similarly immune. So Thursday's decision is not likely to be the last word on the law.
Since 230 was enacted, the lower courts have almost uniformly ruled that people alleging defamation, harassment, and other harms, cannot sue internet companies that publish such content. But the Supreme Court had, until now, had, never ruled on any of those issues. Thursday's decision was a first step, and it could be a harbinger.
=
veryGood! (111)
Related
- Massachusetts lawmakers to consider a soccer stadium for the New England Revolution
- Iris Apfel, fashion icon who garnered social media fame in her later years, dies at 102
- Chris Mortensen, an award-winning reporter who covered the NFL, dies at 72
- Kourtney Kardashian and Travis Barker's Baby Boy Rocky Follows in Dad's Footsteps in Rare Photo
- Georgia remains part of College Football Playoff bracket projection despite loss
- Putting LeBron James' 40,000 points in perspective, from the absurd to the amazing
- A Lake Oswego dad is accused of drugging girls at a sleepover by lacing smoothies: Reports
- Johnny Manziel won't attend Heisman Trophy ceremony until Reggie Bush gets trophy back
- RHOBH's Kyle Richards Addresses PK Kemsley Cheating Rumors in the Best Way Possible
- Federal officials will investigate Oklahoma school following nonbinary teenager’s death
Ranking
- South Carolina does not set a date for the next execution after requests for a holiday pause
- Actor Will Forte says completed Coyote vs. Acme film is likely never coming out
- The 18 Best High-Waisted Bikinis To Make You Feel Confident and Chic- Amazon, SKIMS, Target & More
- 2024 Oscars Guide: Original Song
- What is prize money for NBA Cup in-season tournament? Players get boost in 2024
- Sam Smith Debuts Daring Look While Modeling at Paris Fashion Week
- Organizations work to assist dozens of families displaced by Texas wildfires
- A cross-country effort to capture firsthand memories of Woodstock before they fade away
Recommendation
-
Detroit Mayor Mike Duggan says next year will be his last in office; mum on his plans afterward
-
What is a 'boy mom' and why is it cringey? The social media term explained
-
32 things we learned from 2024 NFL scouting combine: Xavier Worthy sets 40 record, J.J. McCarthy builds buzz
-
The 18 Best High-Waisted Bikinis To Make You Feel Confident and Chic- Amazon, SKIMS, Target & More
-
Detroit Mayor Mike Duggan says next year will be his last in office; mum on his plans afterward
-
Lululemon Leaps into the Balletcore Trend with New Dance Studio Pants & More
-
Women report sexual harassment at glitzy legal tech events in a #MeToo moment
-
Karol G says she's doing 'very well' after her plane reportedly made an emergency landing