Current:Home > NewsEast Palestine residents want more time and information before deciding to accept $600M settlement-LoTradeCoin
East Palestine residents want more time and information before deciding to accept $600M settlement
View Date:2025-01-11 10:29:47
Some East Palestine, Ohio, residents want more time and more information before they have to decide by a deadline this week whether to accept their share of a $600 million class-action settlement with Norfolk Southern over last year’s disastrous train derailment.
But it’s not clear whether the judge will rule on their motion before Thursday’s deadline for people who live within 20 miles (32 kilometers) of the derailment to file a claim.
Residents who live within 10 miles (16 kilometers) of the Feb. 3, 2023, crash near the Ohio-Pennsylvania border also have to decide whether to accept up to $25,000 per person for personal injuries, although accepting that money will force them to give up the right to sue later if someone develops cancer or other serious illness because of the chemical exposure.
The amount residents can receive varies by how close they lived to the derailment, with people who lived within 2 miles receiving $70,000 for property damage. People who lived at the outer edge of the area might only receive a few hundred dollars.
One of the key complaints in the motion filed by attorney David Graham is that attorneys who represented residents in the lawsuit haven’t disclosed any of the results of testing done around town by their own expert, Stephen Petty, who has testified in hundreds of lawsuits about contamination concerns, to determine the extent of the contamination caused when toxic chemicals spilled and burned after the derailment.
Some of the attorneys involved in the case promised residents in news interviews early on that Petty’s data would be disclosed in court filings to lay out the impact on East Palestine. So Graham asked the judge to order that information to be released to try to address residents’ concerns.
“Fast forward to their present, post-settlement posture, and class counsel and their PR machine have now forgotten all about their star testing expert, Petty,” Graham wrote.
Instead of Petty, the lawyers brought out a different expert at an online town hall meeting a couple weeks ago who told residents he didn’t think anyone in town would develop cancer as a result of the derailment. But Dr. Arch Carson didn’t make clear what data he relied on for that opinion other than a brief mention of tests from the Environmental Protection Agency.
Researchers studying the health of residents in the area and tracking respiratory problems, rashes and other ailments they are reporting say it may not be clear for years what the long-term implications of the derailment will be.
“I completely disagree with Dr. Arch Carson – there is no research data that suggest that his statement is correct,” said Dr. Erin Haynes, who is leading one of the main studies in town and is chair of the Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health at the University of Kentucky College of Public Health.
Graham suggested that the plaintiffs’ attorneys might be more interested in collecting their up to $180 million in legal fees than representing residents’ interests.
The plaintiffs’ lawyers didn’t immediately respond to the motion Monday, but they have previously defended the settlement that was announced in the spring. They have said the settlement is bigger than any past derailment settlement that has been made public, and that the amount of time residents received to evaluate the deal is similar to other settlements.
Some residents have complained that the initial opt-out deadline in the lawsuit came less than a week after the National Transportation Safety Board held a hearing on its findings in the investigation.
veryGood! (91)
Related
- Multi-State Offshore Wind Pact Weakened After Connecticut Sits Out First Selection
- Father of imprisoned reporter Evan Gershkovich calls on world leaders to urge Russia to free him
- The new iPhone 15 is a solid upgrade for people with old phones. Here's why
- China's weakening economy in two Indicators
- Kim Kardashian Says She's Raising Her and Kanye West's 4 Kids By Herself
- Dr. Becky, the Parenting Guru Blake Lively Relies On, Has Some Wisdom You Need to Hear
- What a crop of upcoming IPOs from Birkenstock to Instacart tells us about the economy
- Chorus of disapproval: National anthems sung by schoolkids at Rugby World Cup out of tune with teams
- Hurricane-stricken Tampa Bay Rays to play 2025 season at Yankees’ spring training field in Tampa
- Social Security COLA 2024 prediction rises with latest CPI report, inflation data
Ranking
- Panel advises Illinois commemorate its role in helping slaves escape the South
- Wisconsin Republicans push redistricting plan to head off adverse court ruling
- Tinashe says she tries to forget collaborations with R. Kelly, Chris Brown: 'So embarrassing'
- Botulism outbreak tied to sardines served in Bordeaux leaves 1 person dead and several hospitalized
- Smithfield agrees to pay $2 million to resolve child labor allegations at Minnesota meat plant
- 3 people injured in India when a small jet veers off the runway while landing in heavy rain
- Third attempt fails to free luxury cruise ship MV Ocean Explorer that ran aground in Greenland
- Ex-CIA employee snared earlier in classified info bust found guilty of possessing child abuse images
Recommendation
-
Horoscopes Today, November 11, 2024
-
Apple announces iOS 17 update, release date in shadow of iPhone 'Wonderlust' event
-
BP top boss Bernard Looney resigns amid allegations of inappropriate 'personal relationships'
-
'Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom' designers explain why latest hit won't get a follow-up
-
Diamond Sports Group can emerge out of bankruptcy after having reorganization plan approved
-
Suriname prepares for its first offshore oil project that is expected to ease deep poverty
-
F-35 fighter jets land in NATO-member Denmark to replace F-16s, some of which will go to Ukraine
-
Planned Parenthood to resume offering abortions next week in Wisconsin, citing court ruling