Current:Home > FinanceSupreme Court conservatives seem likely to axe SEC enforcement powers-LoTradeCoin
Supreme Court conservatives seem likely to axe SEC enforcement powers
View Date:2024-12-23 15:21:11
The U.S. Supreme Court's conservative justices seemed highly skeptical Wednesday about the way the Securities and Exchange Commission conducts in-house enforcement proceedings to ensure the integrity of securities markets across the country. The case is one of several this term aimed at dismantling what some conservatives have derisively called, "the administrative state."
Wednesday's case was brought by George Jarkesy, a former conservative radio talk show host and hedge fund manager. After a fraud investigation by the SEC and an in-house evidentiary hearing conducted by an administrative law judge, the SEC fined Jarkesy $300,000, ordered him to pay back nearly $700,000 in illicit gains and barred him from various activities in the securities industry.
He challenged the SEC actions in court, contending that he was entitled to a trial in federal court before a jury of his peers, and that Congress didn't have the power to delegate such enforcement powers to an agency. Supporting his challenge is a virtual who's-who of conservative and business groups — plus some individuals like Elon Musk, who has repeatedly resisted the SEC's attempts to investigate stock manipulation charges in his companies.
Although Wednesday's case involved several different constitutional challenges to the SEC's enforcement actions, the justices focused almost exclusively on one: the contention that the agency's in-house fact finding process violated Jarkesy's Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial. All six of the conservative justices questioned the notion that an administrative agency can impose penalties without offering the option of a jury trial.
"It seems to me that undermines the whole point of the constitutional protection in the first place," Chief Justice John Roberts said.
Deputy Solicitor General Brian Fletcher repeatedly replied that Congress has, for some 80 years, delegated these core executive enforcement powers to agencies that are charged with applying the law and imposing consequences for violations. If the SEC's administrative enforcement powers are unconstitutional, he said, so too might be similar enforcement powers at some 34 federal agencies, from the Food and Drug Administration to the National Transportation Safety Board and the Social Security Administration, which issues a whopping half million hearing and appeals dispositions each year.
"The assessment and collection of taxes and penalties, customs and penalties, the immigration laws, the detention and removal of non-citizens — all of those things ... have long been done in the first instance by administrative officers," Fletcher said.
Making the counterargument, Michael McColloch — Jarkesy's lawyer --contended that only those functions that are analogous to laws at the time of the founding in 1791 are presumed to be legitimate.
"The dramatic change that you're proposing in our approach and jurisdiction is going to have consequences across the board," Justice Sonia Sotomayor observed, though McColloch insisted that his approach would not have a huge impact.
Justice Elena Kagan added that in recent decades there have been no challenges to these administrative enforcement functions because these powers have been considered "settled." That prompted McColloch to say, "it's settled only to the extent no one's brought it up." To which Kagan replied, "Nobody has had the chutzpah, to quote my people, to bring it up."
Kagan noted that there have been three major tranches of securities legislation to strengthen securities enforcement: First during the Great Depression in the 1930s when the agency was founded, then after the Savings and Loan Crisis in the 1980s and then after the 2008 Great Recession when huge investment banks failed, sending the economy spiraling downward and forcing a federal bailout to prevent even more bank failures.
Each time, observed Kagan, "Congress thought ... something is going terribly wrong here ... people are being harmed." And "Congress said 'we have to give the SEC ... greater authorities.' "
"I mean, is Congress' judgment ... entitled to no respect?" Kagan asked.
The conservative court's answer to that question may well be, "No."
veryGood! (2178)
Related
- Elon Musk responds after Chloe Fineman alleges he made her 'burst into tears' on 'SNL'
- Chicago Bears will make the No. 1 pick in the NFL draft for just the third time ever
- In honor of Earth Day 2024, today's Google Doodle takes us on a trip around the world
- Primary voters take down at least 2 incumbents in Pennsylvania House
- Man killed by police in Minnesota was being sought in death of his pregnant wife
- Why the military withdrawal from Niger is a devastating blow to the U.S., and likely a win for Russia
- United Methodists open first high-level conference since breakup over LGBTQ inclusion
- US Rep. Donald Payne Jr., a Democrat from New Jersey, has died at 65 after a heart attack
- Mega Millions winning numbers for November 8 drawing: Jackpot rises to $361 million
- Arizona Democrats poised to continue effort to repeal 1864 abortion ban
Ranking
- Bev Priestman fired as Canada women’s soccer coach after review of Olympic drone scandal
- From Tom Cruise breakdancing to Spice Girls reuniting, reports from Victoria Beckham's bash capture imagination
- Don Steven McDougal indicted in murder, attempted kidnapping of 11-year-old Audrii Cunningham
- Arizona Democrats attempt to repeal the state’s 19th century abortion ban
- See Chris Evans' Wife Alba Baptista Show Her Sweet Support at Red One Premiere
- Amazon debuts grocery delivery program for Prime members, SNAP recipients
- Billionaire Texas oilman inks deal with Venezuela’s state-run oil giant as U.S. sanctions loom
- New Jersey is motivating telecommuters to appeal their New York tax bills. Connecticut may be next
Recommendation
-
Florida Man Arrested for Cold Case Double Murder Almost 50 Years Later
-
Earth Day 2024: Some scientists are calling for urgent optimism for change | The Excerpt
-
USPS commits to rerouting Reno-area mail despite bipartisan pushback and mail ballot concerns
-
Why U.S. officials want to ban TikTok
-
World War II veteran reflects on life as he turns 100
-
New laptop designs cram bigger displays into smaller packages
-
Arizona Democrats attempt to repeal the state’s 19th century abortion ban
-
Justice Department to pay $138.7 million to settle with ex-USA gymnastics official Larry Nassar victims