Current:Home > Contact-usTexas Supreme Court hears arguments to clarify abortion ban-LoTradeCoin
Texas Supreme Court hears arguments to clarify abortion ban
View Date:2025-01-11 13:29:49
Austin, Texas — A lawyer representing 20 women and two doctors argued before the all-Republican Texas Supreme Court on Tuesday that women have been denied lifesaving care under the state's strict abortion law as they seek to clarify what qualifies as a medical exception.
"We are just seeking clarification on what the law aims to do," said Molly Duane, a lawyer for the Center for Reproductive Rights, which brought the lawsuit.
Five women who were denied abortions under the state filed the lawsuit in March, and they were later joined by 17 other plaintiffs, including two doctors. The lawsuit, which was brought by the Center for Reproductive Rights, is believed to be the first to be brought by women who were denied abortions after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade last year.
Unlike other legal challenges to abortion laws, this case does not seek to overturn Texas' ban but rather to clarify what qualifies as a medical exemption. But Supreme Court Justice Brett Busby said the job of the court is to "decide cases," and not to "elaborate and expand laws in order to make them easier to understand or enforce."
Beth Klusmann, a lawyer for the state, argued Tuesday that the women did not have the standing to sue, suggesting that the women should have instead sued their doctors for medical malpractice.
Duane argued on Tuesday that because the law is unclear, the women were denied lifesaving care, and that the state's interpretation means that "women would need to have blood or amniotic fluid dripping down their leg before they can come to court."
Earlier this year, a judge in Austin ruled that women who experience pregnancy complications are exempt from the state's abortion ban. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton appealed the ruling, bringing the legal challenge to the state Supreme Court.
In August, Travis County Judge Jessica Mangrum placed an injunction on the law, ruling that the plaintiffs faced "an imminent threat of irreparable harm under Texas's abortion bans. This injunction is necessary to preserve Plaintiffs' legal right to obtain or provide abortion care in Texas in connection with emergent medical conditions under the medical exception and the Texas Constitution."
The injunction was put on hold when Paxton appealed.
- In:
- Texas
- Abortion
veryGood! (5)
Related
- Democrat Ruben Gallego wins Arizona US Senate race against Republican Kari Lake
- Travis Kelce Shares Honest Reaction to Getting Booed While at NBA Playoffs Game
- Michigan State Police trooper charged with murder, accused of hitting man with car during chase
- At 100, this vet says the ‘greatest generation’ moniker fits ‘because we saved the world.’
- Video ‘bares’ all: Insurers say bear that damaged luxury cars was actually a person in a costume
- Seattle police chief dismissed from top job amid discrimination, harassment lawsuits
- 'Yellowstone' stars Hassie Harrison and Ryan Bingham tie the knot during cowboy-themed wedding
- TikTok ban challenge set for September arguments
- Burt Bacharach, composer of classic songs, will have papers donated to Library of Congress
- VP Harris to address US Air Force Academy graduates
Ranking
- Today’s Savannah Guthrie, Al Roker and More React to Craig Melvin Replacing Hoda Kotb as Co-Anchor
- Why Real Housewives of Dubai's Caroline Stanbury Used Ozempic During Midlife Crisis
- Best MLB stadium food: Ranking the eight top ballparks for eats in 2024
- Baby formula maker recalls batch after failing to register formula with FDA
- Candidates line up for special elections to replace Virginia senators recently elected to US House
- 'Moana 2' trailer: Auli'i Cravalho and Dwayne Johnson set sail in Disney sequel
- Could DNA testing give Scott Peterson a new trial? Man back in court over 20 years after Laci Peterson's death
- Sofía Vergara Reveals She Gets Botox and Her Future Plastic Surgery Plans
Recommendation
-
Prosecutor failed to show that Musk’s $1M-a-day sweepstakes was an illegal lottery, judge says
-
F-35 fighter jet worth $135M crashes near Albuquerque International Sunport, pilot injured
-
Ohio man gets probation after pleading guilty to threatening North Caroilna legislator
-
‘Star Trek’ actor George Takei is determined to keep telling his Japanese American story
-
Police cruiser strikes and kills a bicyclist pulling a trailer in Vermont
-
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. says he opposed removal of Confederate monuments
-
Oilers roar back, score 5 unanswered goals to tie conference finals with Stars 2-2
-
Journalism groups sue Wisconsin Justice Department for names of every police officer in state