Current:Home > StocksHere's how each Supreme Court justice voted to decide the affirmative action cases-LoTradeCoin
Here's how each Supreme Court justice voted to decide the affirmative action cases
View Date:2024-12-23 19:00:29
The Supreme Court decided 6-3 and 6-2 that race-conscious admission policies of the University of North Carolina and Harvard College violate the Constitution, effectively bringing to an end to affirmative action in higher education through a decision that will reverberate across campuses nationwide.
The rulings fell along ideological lines. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the majority opinion for both cases, and Justice Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh wrote concurring opinions. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote a dissenting opinion. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has ties to Harvard and recused herself in that case, but wrote a dissent in the North Carolina case.
The ruling is the latest from the Supreme Court's conservative majority that has upended decades of precedent, including overturning Roe v. Wade in 2022.
- Read the full text of the decision
Here's how the justices split on the affirmative action cases:
Supreme Court justices who voted against affirmative action
The court's six conservatives formed the majority in each cases. Roberts' opinion was joined by Thomas, Samuel Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett. The chief justice wrote that Harvard and UNC's race-based admission guidelines "cannot be reconciled with the guarantees of the Equal Protection Clause."
"Respondents' race-based admissions systems also fail to comply with the Equal Protection Clause's twin commands that race may never be used as a 'negative' and that it may not operate as a stereotype," Roberts wrote. "The First Circuit found that Harvard's consideration of race has resulted in fewer admissions of Asian-American students. Respondents' assertion that race is never a negative factor in their admissions programs cannot withstand scrutiny. College admissions are zerosum, and a benefit provided to some applicants but not to others necessarily advantages the former at the expense of the latter. "
Roberts said that prospective students should be evaluated "as an individual — not on the basis of race," although universities can still consider "an applicant's discussion of how race affected his or her life, be it through discrimination, inspiration, or otherwise."
Supreme Court justices who voted to uphold affirmative action
The court's three liberals all opposed the majority's decision to reject race as a factor in college admissions. Sotomayor's dissent was joined by Justice Elena Kagan in both cases, and by Jackson in the UNC case. Both Sotomayor and Kagan signed onto Jackson's dissent as well.
Sotomayor argued that the admissions processes are lawful under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
"The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment enshrines a guarantee of racial equality," Sotomayor wrote. "The Court long ago concluded that this guarantee can be enforced through race-conscious means in a society that is not, and has never been, colorblind."
In her dissent in the North Carolina case, Jackson recounted the long history of discrimination in the U.S. and took aim at the majority's ruling.
"With let-them-eat-cake obliviousness, today, the majority pulls the ripcord and announces 'colorblindness for all' by legal fiat," Jackson wrote. "But deeming race irrelevant in law does not make it so in life."
Melissa Quinn contributed to this report.
- In:
- Affirmative Action
- Supreme Court of the United States
veryGood! (4234)
Related
- Trump's election has women swearing off sex with men. It's called the 4B movement.
- Did 'Veep' predict Kamala Harris' presidential run? HBO series sees viewership surge
- Watch: Whale of New Hampshire slams into fishing boat, hurling men into the Atlantic
- When does Team USA march at 2024 Paris Olympics opening ceremony? What to know
- 13 Skincare Gifts Under $50 That Are Actually Worth It
- Prosecutors file Boeing’s plea deal to resolve felony fraud charge tied to 737 Max crashes
- Schools across Maine confront unique challenges in ridding their water of ‘forever chemicals’
- Connecticut woman found dead hours before she was to be sentenced for killing her husband
- A herniated disc is painful, debilitating. How to get relief.
- Coco Gauff joins LeBron James as US flag bearers for opening ceremony
Ranking
- Brittany Cartwright Defends Hooking Up With Jax Taylor's Friend Amid Their Divorce
- Man who attacked author Salman Rushdie charged with supporting terrorist group
- The Daily Money: What is $1,000 a month worth?
- CirKor Trading Center: What is tokenization?
- Climate Advocacy Groups Say They’re Ready for Trump 2.0
- Andrew Tate’s defamation lawsuit against human trafficking accuser can go to trial, judge says
- Cartoonist Roz Chast to be honored at the Brooklyn Book Festival, which runs from Sept. 22-30
- Disney reaches tentative agreement with California theme park workers
Recommendation
-
Old Navy's Early Black Friday Deals Start at $1.97 -- Get Holiday-Ready Sweaters, Skirts, Puffers & More
-
Fake protest set for TV shoot on NYC campus sparks real demonstration by pro-Palestinian activists
-
TNT loses NBA media rights after league rejects offer, enters deal with Amazon
-
Woman dies in West Virginia’s second reported coal mining fatality of 2024
-
The View's Sara Haines Walks Off After Whoopi Goldberg's NSFW Confession
-
Member of an Arizona tribe is accused of starting a wildfire that destroyed 21 homes on reservation
-
19 Kids and Counting's Jana Duggar Reveals She's Moved Out of Family's House
-
Internet rallies for Maya Rudolph to return as Kamala Harris on 'Saturday Night Live'