Current:Home > ScamsDivided Supreme Court rules no quick hearing required when police seize property-LoTradeCoin
Divided Supreme Court rules no quick hearing required when police seize property
View Date:2024-12-23 18:16:43
WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court ruled Thursday that authorities do not have to provide a quick hearing when they seize cars and other property used in drug crimes, even when the property belongs to so-called innocent owners.
By a 6-3 vote, the justices rejected the claims of two Alabama women who had to wait more than a year for their cars to be returned. Police had stopped the cars when they were being driven by other people and, after finding drugs, seized the vehicles.
Civil forfeiture allows authorities to take someone’s property, without having to prove that it has been used for illicit purposes. Critics of the practice describe it as “legalized theft.”
Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote for the conservative majority that a civil forfeiture hearing to determine whether an owner will lose the property permanently must be timely. But he said the Constitution does not also require a separate hearing about whether police may keep cars or other property in the meantime.
In a dissent for the liberal members of the court, Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote that civil forfeiture is “vulnerable to abuse” because police departments often have a financial incentive to keep the property.
“In short, law enforcement can seize cars, hold them indefinitely, and then rely on an owner’s lack of resources to forfeit those cars to fund agency budgets, all without any initial check by a judge as to whether there is a basis to hold the car in the first place,” Sotomayor wrote.
The women, Halima Culley and Lena Sutton, filed federal lawsuits arguing they were entitled to a prompt court hearing that would have resulted in the cars being returned to them much sooner. There was no suggestion that either woman was involved in or knew anything about the illegal activity.
Sutton had loaned her car to a friend. Police in Leesburg, Alabama seized it when they arrested him for trafficking methamphetamine.
Sutton ended up without her car for 14 months, during which she couldn’t find work, stay current with bills or keep her mental-health appointments, her lawyers wrote in court papers.
Culley had bought a car for her son to use at college. Police in Satsuma, Alabama stopped the car and found marijuana and a loaded hangun. They charged the son with marijuana possession and kept the car.
The Supreme Court decision means months or years of delay for people whose property is taken, said Kirby Thomas West, co-director of the National Initiative to End Forfeiture Abuse at the libertarian Institute for Justice.
“Meanwhile owners of seized vehicles will scramble to find a way to get to work, take their kids to school, run errands, and complete other essential life tasks,” West said in an email.
Justice Neil Gorsuch was part of Thursday’s majority, but in an opinion also joined by Justice Clarence Thomas, Gorsuch said larger questions about the use of civil forfeiture remain unresolved.
Noting that civil forfeiture has become a “booming business,” Gorsuch wrote the court should use a future case to assess whether the modern practice of civil forfeiture is in line with constitutional guarantees that property may not be taken “without due process of law.”
veryGood! (41)
Related
- The Masked Singer's Ice King Might Be a Jonas Brother
- Historic winter storm buries New Mexico, Colorado in snow. Warmer temps ahead
- 'Like herding cats': Llamas on the loose in Utah were last seen roaming train tracks
- Will Nico Collins play Week 10? Latest updates as Texans WR returns to practice
- Flurry of contract deals come as railroads, unions see Trump’s election looming over talks
- Dr. Phil Alum Bhad Bhabie Says She's Taking Cancer Medicine Amid Recent Weight Loss
- Messi, Inter Miami 'keeping calm' before decisive MLS playoff game vs. Atlanta United
- After impressive Georgia win, there's no denying Lane Kiffin is a legit ball coach
- Stop smartphone distractions by creating a focus mode: Video tutorial
- 5 wounded in shooting at Virginia restaurant
Ranking
- Study finds Wisconsin voters approved a record number of school referenda
- Stocks rally again. Dow and S&P 500 see best week this year after big Republican win
- Democratic US Sen. Jacky Rosen is reelected in Nevada, securing battleground seat
- North Carolina governor picks labor chief to serve until next commissioner is sworn in
- Why the US celebrates Veterans Day and how the holiday has changed over time
- Barry Keoghan Has the Sweetest Response to Sabrina Carpenter's Grammy Nominations
- A push for school choice fell short in Trump’s first term. He may now have a more willing Congress
- Yellowstone Cast Reveals “Challenging” Series End Without Kevin Costner
Recommendation
-
Who will be in the top 12? Our College Football Playoff ranking projection
-
'Like herding cats': Llamas on the loose in Utah were last seen roaming train tracks
-
Will Nico Collins play Week 10? Latest updates as Texans WR returns to practice
-
How Ariana Grande Channeled Wizard of Oz's Dorothy at Wicked's Los Angeles Premiere
-
J.Crew Outlet Quietly Drops Their Black Friday Deals - Save Up to 70% off Everything, Styles Start at $12
-
Community grieves 10-year-old student hit and killed by school bus in Missouri
-
NASA says Starliner astronauts Suni Williams, Butch Wilmore 'in good health' on ISS
-
After impressive Georgia win, there's no denying Lane Kiffin is a legit ball coach