Current:Home > InvestScientists say they've confirmed fossilized human footprints found in New Mexico are between 21,000 and 23,000 years old-LoTradeCoin
Scientists say they've confirmed fossilized human footprints found in New Mexico are between 21,000 and 23,000 years old
View Date:2024-12-23 22:21:54
Scientists have confirmed that fossilized footprints found in New Mexico are between 21,000 and 23,000 years old — meaning humans existed in North America much earlier than previously believed.
The originally study about the footprints, discovered embedded in the ground of White Sands National Park in New Mexico, was published in September 2021, sparking conversations, with some questioning the accuracy of the findings.
It was believed humans existed in North America somewhere between 13,500 and 16,000 years ago. So, were the prints — some of which look distinctly human with five toes — really between 21,000 and 23,000 years old?
Researchers from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and other scientist decided to do a follow-up study, using two new approaches to determine the age of the prints.
"The immediate reaction in some circles of the archeological community was that the accuracy of our dating was insufficient to make the extraordinary claim that humans were present in North America during the Last Glacial Maximum," said co-author of the new study, Jeff Pigati, a USGS research geologist. "But our targeted methodology in this current research really paid off,"
The scientists initially used seeds from the Ruppia cirrhosa plant found in the fossils. They used radiocarbon dating to determine the age of the seeds, but because the plants are aquatic and can hold carbon from the water instead of the air, the age estimate could have been off.
So, in the new study, they used radiocarbon dating on conifer pollen, which comes from plants on earth, that were found in the same layers as the seeds. "Even as the original work was being published, we were forging ahead to test our results with multiple lines of evidence," said co-author Kathleen Springer, a USGS research geologist. "We were confident in our original ages, as well as the strong geologic, hydrologic, and stratigraphic evidence, but we knew that independent chronologic control was critical."
The researchers had to isolate a whopping 75,000 pollen grains from the same layer and found that their age was statistically identical to the Ruppia cirrhosa seeds.
To further check their dating, they also tested quartz grains found in the footprints using a different dating process, optically stimulated luminescence. They found the quartz had a minimum age of about 21,500 years.
USGS says with three corroborating pieces of evidence, it is unlikely the age range of 21,000 to 23,000 years is incorrect.
Footprints have been found at White Sands before, according to the National Park Service. After first finding footprints in a lakebed in 2006, scientists later dug them up and found both human and sloth footprints. They later found direwolf prints and dated those 18,000 years by using ancient seeds found nearby. They also found footprints of a female and a toddler in 2018.
In 2018, researchers discovered what they believe to be footprints of a female. They tell a story that may seem familiar today; her footprints show her walking for almost a mile, with a toddler's footprints occasionally showing up beside hers. Evidence suggests that she carried the child, shifting them from side to side and occasionally setting the child down as they walked. The footprints broadened and slipped in the mud as a result of the additional weight she was carrying.
The 2021 study found the footprints mainly belong to teens and children, which may be due to a division of labor, with teens performing "fetching and carrying tasks" and children accompanying them.
Caitlin O'KaneCaitlin O'Kane is a digital content producer covering trending stories for CBS News and its good news brand, The Uplift.
veryGood! (18313)
Related
- Harriet Tubman posthumously honored as general in Veterans Day ceremony: 'Long overdue'
- Horoscopes Today, August 31, 2023
- A look inside Donald Trump’s deposition: Defiance, deflection and the ‘hottest brand in the world’
- One dead, at least two injured in stabbings at jail in Atlanta that is under federal investigation
- Prominent conservative lawyer Ted Olson, who argued Bush recount and same-sex marriage cases, dies
- Tropical Storm Idalia brings flooding to South Carolina
- Oprah Winfrey and Dwayne Johnson launch fund with $10 million for displaced Maui residents
- Powerball jackpot grows to $386 million after no winner Monday. See winning numbers for Aug. 30.
- Kalen DeBoer, Jalen Milroe save Alabama football season, as LSU's Brian Kelly goes splat
- Biden wants an extra $4 billion for disaster relief, bringing total request to $16 billion
Ranking
- Pedro Pascal's Sister Lux Pascal Debuts Daring Slit on Red Carpet at Gladiator II Premiere
- Velocity at what cost? MLB's hardest throwers keep succumbing to Tommy John surgery
- Dolphins' Tyreek Hill won't be suspended by NFL for June marina incident
- 2 dead, 3 injured in shooting at Austin business, authorities say
- Champions Classic is for elite teams. So why is Michigan State still here? | Opinion
- Federal health agency recommends easing marijuana restrictions
- Dodge Charger SRT Hellcat is 60 times more likely to be stolen than any other 2020-22 vehicle
- These kids are good: Young Reds in pursuit of a pennant stretch to remember
Recommendation
-
Judith Jamison, a dancer both eloquent and elegant, led Ailey troupe to success over two decades
-
Alabama lawmaker agrees to plead guilty to voter fraud
-
Your Labor Day weekend travel forecast
-
Former state senator accused of spending COVID-19 relief loan on luxury cars
-
Engines on 1.4 million Honda vehicles might fail, so US regulators open an investigation
-
These kids are good: Young Reds in pursuit of a pennant stretch to remember
-
Is beer sold at college football games? Here's where you can buy it during the 2023 season
-
Texas waves goodbye to sales tax on menstrual products, diapers: 'Meaningful acknowledgment'