Current:Home > FinanceWill Trump’s hush money conviction stand? A judge will rule on the president-elect’s immunity claim-LoTradeCoin
Will Trump’s hush money conviction stand? A judge will rule on the president-elect’s immunity claim
View Date:2024-12-23 11:57:36
NEW YORK (AP) — A gut punch for most defendants, Donald Trump turned his criminal conviction into a rallying cry. His supporters put “I’m Voting for the Felon” on T-shirts, hats and lawn signs.
“The real verdict is going to be Nov. 5 by the people,” Trump proclaimed after his conviction in New York last spring on 34 counts of falsifying business records.
Now, just a week after Trump’s resounding election victory, a Manhattan judge is poised to decide whether to uphold the hush money verdict or dismiss it because of a U.S. Supreme Court decision in July that gave presidents broad immunity from criminal prosecution.
Judge Juan M. Merchan has said he will issue a written opinion Tuesday on Trump’s request to toss his conviction and either order a new trial or dismiss the indictment entirely.
Merchan had been expected to rule in September, but put it off “to avoid any appearance” he was trying to sway the election. His decision could be on ice again if Trump takes other steps to delay or end the case.
If the judge upholds the verdict, the case would be on track for sentencing Nov. 26 — though that could shift or vanish depending on appeals or other legal maneuvers.
Trump’s lawyers have been fighting for months to reverse his conviction, which involved efforts to conceal a $130,000 payment to porn actor Stormy Daniels, whose affair allegations threatened to disrupt his 2016 campaign.
Trump denies her claim, maintains he did nothing wrong and has decried the verdict as a “rigged, disgraceful” result of a politically motivated “witch hunt” meant to harm his campaign.
The Supreme Court’s ruling gives former presidents immunity from prosecution for official acts — things they do as part of their job as president — and bars prosecutors from using evidence of official acts in trying to prove that purely personal conduct violated the law.
Trump was a private citizen — campaigning for president, but neither elected nor sworn in — when his then-lawyer Michael Cohen paid Daniels in October 2016.
But Trump was president when Cohen was reimbursed, and Cohen testified that they discussed the repayment arrangement in the Oval Office. Those reimbursements, jurors found, were falsely logged in Trump’s records as legal expenses.
Trump’s lawyers contend the Manhattan district attorney’s office “tainted” the case with evidence — including testimony about Trump’s first term as president — that shouldn’t have been allowed.
Prosecutors maintain that the high court’s ruling provides “no basis for disturbing the jury’s verdict.” Trump’s conviction, they said, involved unofficial acts — personal conduct for which he is not immune.
The Supreme Court didn’t define an official act, leaving that to lower courts. Nor did it make clear how its ruling — which arose from one of Trump’s two federal criminal cases — pertains to state-level cases like Trump’s hush money prosecution.
“There are several murky aspects of the court’s ruling, but one that is particularly relevant to this case is the issue of what counts as an official act,” said George Mason University law professor Ilya Somin. “And I think it’s extremely difficult to argue that this payoff to this woman does qualify as an official act, for a number of fairly obvious reasons.”
Trump’s efforts to erase the verdict have taken on new urgency since his election, with a sentencing date looming at the end of the month and possible punishments ranging from a fine or probation to up to four years in prison.
Presidents-elect don’t typically enjoy the same legal protections as presidents, but Trump and his lawyers could try to leverage his unique status as a former and future commander-in-chief into something of a “Get Out of Jail Free” card.
One likely argument: Trump wouldn’t just be saving himself from a potential prison sentence, he’d be sparing the nation from the calamity of its leader behind bars — however remote that possibility is.
“He’ll ask every court in the world to intervene if he can, including the Supreme Court, so that could drag things out a bit,” said Syracuse University law professor David Driesen, author of the book, “The Specter of Dictatorship: Judicial Enabling of Presidential Power.”
At the same time, Trump has been attempting to again move the case from state court to federal court, where he could also assert immunity. His lawyers have asked the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to reverse a judge’s September ruling denying the transfer.
If Merchan orders a new trial, it seems unlikely that could happen while Trump is in office.
Trump’s lawyers argued in court papers that, given the Supreme Court ruling, jurors shouldn’t have been allowed to hear about matters including his conversations with then-White House communications director Hope Hicks, nor another aide’s testimony about his work practices.
Also verboten, they said, was prosecutors’ use of Trump’s 2018 financial disclosure report, which he was required as president to file. A footnote mentioned that Trump reimbursed Cohen in 2017 for unspecified expenses the year before.
Trump lawyers Todd Blanche and Emil Bove argued that prosecutors were trying “to assign a criminal motive” to some of Trump’s actions in office to “unfairly prejudice” him. For example, they wrote, prosecutors pushed the “dubious theory” that some of Trump’s 2018 tweets were part of a “pressure campaign” to keep Cohen from turning on him.
The immunity decision “forecloses inquiry into those motives,” Blanche and Bove wrote.
Prosecutors countered that the ruling doesn’t apply to the evidence in question, and that regardless, it’s “only a sliver of the mountains of testimony and documentary proof” the jury considered.
veryGood! (4734)
Related
- Stock market today: Asian stocks decline as China stimulus plan disappoints markets
- Illegal border crossings rose by 33% in July, fueled by increase along Arizona desert
- What is dengue fever? What to know as virus cases are confirmed in Florida
- Blake Lively, Zoey Deutch and More Stars You Didn’t Know Have Famous Relatives
- Singles' Day vs. Black Friday: Which Has the Best Deals for Smart Shoppers?
- Man convicted of hit-and-run that killed Ohio firefighter sentenced to 16 years to life in prison
- How a family’s choice to donate a body for pig kidney research could help change transplants
- Navy shipbuilders’ union approves 3-year labor pact at Bath Iron Works
- Ex-Phoenix Suns employee files racial discrimination, retaliation lawsuit against the team
- Saudi Arabia says it executed U.S. national convicted of killing and torturing his father
Ranking
- Lala Kent Swears by This Virgo-Approved Accessory and Shares Why Stassi Schroeder Inspires Her Fall Style
- Bruce Springsteen postpones Philadelphia concerts because of illness
- Man returns to college after random acts of kindness from CBS News viewers
- Dwayne Haskins' widow settles with driver and owners of dump truck that hit and killed him
- Bridgerton's Luke Newton Details His Physical Transformation for Season 3's Leading Role
- Hozier recalls 'super moving' jam session at Joni Mitchell's house: 'We all worship Joni'
- Lolita, beloved killer whale who had been in captivity, has died, Miami Seaquarium says
- Lionel Messi, Inter Miami face Nashville SC in Leagues Cup final: How to stream
Recommendation
-
Quincy Jones' cause of death revealed: Reports
-
A raid on a Kansas newspaper likely broke the law, experts say. But which one?
-
Gambling spectators yell at Max Homa, Chris Kirk during play at BMW Championship
-
Trader Joe's recalls multigrain crackers after metal was found
-
Vogue Model Dynus Saxon Charged With Murder After Stabbing Attack
-
Save $235 on This Dyson Cordless Vacuum and Give Your Home a Deep Cleaning With Ease
-
Maui water is unsafe even with filters, one of the lessons learned from fires in California
-
WWE star Edge addresses questions about retirement after SmackDown win in hometown